Home / Customer reactivation / Case study
CASE STUDY
Reconnecting after a long silence.
What the campaign reported.
A real reactivation campaign was sent in several batches to 360 customers. Some had not been contacted for more than three years. Here are the results reported by WatsBridge, and what they can reasonably tell us.
Published 30 October 2026 · WatsBridge · Internal campaign summary
83.5%
Gross delivery
Reported for the contact list, without excluding assumed invalid or non-WhatsApp numbers.
75–85%
Reported read rates
The range reported across batches, with timing among the factors that varied.
Up to 32%
Reported click rate
The highest rate reported for a message, rather than the average for every batch.
9
Unsubscribes
The count supplied for the campaign. This is not a measure of everyone else’s sentiment.
These figures describe this reported campaign. They are not market benchmarks, guaranteed results or a conversion forecast.
The starting point was an existing relationship.
The audience consisted of existing customers, including people who had not heard from the business for several years. This was a reactivation exercise, not an acquisition test on a new or purchased audience.
The aim was to resume contact and observe the response. The summary reports delivery and engagement, but does not establish how many additional sales the campaign caused.
Results varied with the send timing and the message. Because several conditions changed across batches, the observations do not isolate the effect of a particular hour, day or wording.
READING THE EVIDENCE
What is documented, and what is still missing.
The available evidence for this publication is the aggregate campaign summary supplied by WatsBridge. Exact send dates, batch sizes and raw event exports are not included in this public account.
The exact denominators for the reported read and click rates, and whether clicks represent unique people or total interactions, remain to be documented. Those percentages should therefore be read as reported campaign figures, rather than compared directly with a differently defined dashboard.
We do not increase the delivery rate by assuming that every non-delivered message went to someone without WhatsApp or with a changed number. The cause of each failure would need evidence before an adjusted figure could be justified.
The response makes a case for a careful first send.
The reported reads and clicks show that the campaign generated observable engagement despite the long gap in contact for some customers. That is a useful reason to investigate reactivation with a relevant, eligible audience.
A click can mean curiosity, research or a desire to buy. It does not establish purchasing intent on its own. Likewise, nine unsubscribes do not prove that every remaining customer welcomed the message; replies, complaints and other feedback would be needed to assess sentiment.
For another business, the practical lesson is to begin with a defined audience, a useful reason to write and enough capacity to respond. Document the calculation base and reporting window from the beginning.
Plan the message and the journey after it.
Even a widely read message needs a clear offer and a working destination. A slow page, missing information or an unanswered question can stop the customer’s next step.
WatsBridge helps organise the communication and the follow-up. Acquisition, offer quality, the website and commercial execution remain part of the result.
Have a customer list worth reconnecting with?
Start with the relationship, the relevant permission and the reason for writing. The launch programmes provide a route to reviewing your setup.
